Letters: Yet again US backs the jihadists

From scoot.net

Jump to: navigation, search

img, .hide-comment-buttons #singleCommentHeader .formContainer >.title, .hide-comment-buttons #loginButtonContainer display: none; /* Expandable MPU fix */ #side .x300 overflow: visible!important; /* Collapsing Skyscraper fix */ .ad div.skyscraper height:auto!important;padding:0px!important; .ad div#mpu.skyscraper height:600px!important; Letters: Yet again, US backs the jihadists - Letters - Voices - The Independent Monday 02 March 2015

Apps

eBooks

i Jobs

Dating

Shop
News
Video
People
Voices Find by writer Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
Rebecca Armstrong
Memphis Barker
Max Benwell
Chris Blackhurst
Ian Burrell
Andrew Buncombe
Ben Chu
Patrick Cockburn
Mary Dejevsky
Grace Dent
Robert Fisk
Andrew Grice
Stefano Hatfield
Lucy Hunter Johnston
Howard Jacobson
Alice Jones
Ellen E Jones
Simon Kelner
Lisa Markwell
Michael McCarthy
Hamish McRae
Jane Merrick
James Moore
Matthew Norman
Dom Joly
Amol Rajan
John Rentoul
Steve Richards
Deborah Ross
Kim Sengupta
Joan Smith
Mark Steel
Janet Street-Porter
John Walsh
Andreas Whittam Smith

Comment
Editorials
Letters
IV Drip
Campaigns Homeless Veterans
Save the tiger
Elephant Campaign
Equal Partners
Delayed Diagnosis
We are Malala
Child Soldiers
Voices in Danger
The New Suffragettes
Rory Peck Awards
British Citizen Awards

Archive
Our Voices Rentoul
The Editors
The Foreign Desk
Battle of Ideas

Commentators Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
Terence Blacker
Simon Carr
Rupert Cornwell
Sloane Crosley
Mary Dejevsky
Robert Fisk
Andrew Grice
Adrian Hamilton
Philip Hensher
Howard Jacobson
Dominic Lawson
John Lichfield
Campaigns
Hamish McRae
Matthew Norman
Christina Patterson
John Rentoul
Steve Richards
Sarah Sands
Mary Ann Sieghart
Joan Smith
Mark Steel
Campaigns
Janet Street-Porter
Andreas Whittam Smith
Voices

Columnists Dom Joly
David Lister
Thomas Sutcliffe
John Walsh
Janet Street-Porter
Chris Bryant

Democracy 2015
IV Drip Archive
Blogs
Scottish independence
Save the tiger
The state of the NHS

Sport
Tech
Life
Property
Arts + Ents
Travel
Money
IndyBest
Student
Offers
Hot Topics Jihadi John Battle for Mosul Leonard Nimroy Sunday 16 June 2013
Letters: Yet again, US backs the jihadists These letters appear in the Monday 17th June edition of the Independent
Share Is there any truth in the rumour that the United States is changing its motto to Nunquam discimus - �We never learn�?
Having created al-Qa�ida by arming and training Bin Laden and his Islamic fundamentalists in Afghanistan, the US now seems keen to further support their protege by arming Jabhat al-Nusra in Syria.
The Afghan adventure was an opportunistic attempt to drive out the Russians - although, from what we read, life in Afghanistan was better under the Russians, especially for women, than it had been before or has been since. I suggest that the current interference in Syria is largely an attempt to deprive the Russians of the port of Tartus, their only naval facility on the Mediterranean.
Claims that the Syrian government forces have used chemical weapons are flimsy, and bear an alarming similarity to spurious justifications employed by the Bush/Blair axis. They are a bit rich coming from a country which stands accused of using so much depleted uranium in Iraq that tens of thousands of Iraqis were born with deformities.
Some months ago I received a furious email from a non-Muslim Iranian friend: will the West not be satisfied until every secular country in the Middle East has been turned into a fundamentalist Islamic state? How do you think we should answer him?
Robert Curtis
Birmingham
The great error of the US in supplying arms to one side in the Syrian civil war is that it will reinforce the perception among many Muslims of the US as a religious aggressor in the homelands of Islam. It therefore serves to escalate the perceived conflict between �the West� and �Islam�. It will also of course (as Robert Fisk points out) merely exacerbate an already perhaps irreconcilable conflict in Syria itself.
Behind this error of judgement lies a tendency in the West to see war as a judicial process, a way of righting wrongs (in this case, the use of chemical weapons) rather than a means of achieving a desirable outcome, namely peace. This legalism or moralism seems to skew western thinking, especially but not solely in the media, on the subject of war in the Middle East, and elsewhere.
Antony Black
Emeritus professor in the history of political thought, University of Dundee

Gove�s �island story� is a good place to start
The trouble with history, as any fule kno, is that there is so much of it. It thus makes sense to start with a bit of it which is highly significant, not so huge as to be overwhelming, and sufficiently close to home to be naturally interesting. The history of one of the most remarkable countries in the world�s history - Great Britain - is therefore, as it happens, an excellent place to start.
Whatever one thinks of Michael Gove�s politics, I see nothing remotely objectionable in teaching our children �our island story in all its glory�. Any decent teacher will hopefully inspire children to grasp the forces that propelled us from huts to houses and from religion to reason, and then to think beyond this island starting point, and to understand the relative importance of other times and places.
Sorry Professor Evans and colleagues (letter, 13 June) but you fail to convince.
Jim Bowman
South Harrow, Middlesex
When I went as an exchange teacher to teach social studies in New York City in 1966, I was astonished to find that the teachers� instruction book for the city included this: �The aim of the Social Studies programme is to indoctrinate the students with the merits of American democracy.�
I objected to that and raised it with my Jewish liberal colleagues, who were embarrassed by it and explained that it was written 10 years before in the era of the McCarthy witch-hunts.
Will we, in 10 years� time, be equally embarrassed by a history diktat written in the era of Govian anti-liberal political bias?
Anthony D Wood
Liskeard, Cornwall
The Department for Education�s response to the letter from over 100 historians and history teachers (13 June) outlining legal concerns with the government�s approach to history teaching is yet further evidence of its failure seriously to address the charge of political bias.
Few would disagree with the DfE�s comment: �It is absolutely absurd to claim that teaching the history of Britain is illegal or politically biased�. But if the DfE spokesmen seriously believe that reforming the teaching of history in order to �celebrate� Britain�s role in the world does not constitute political bias, then I suggest they consult a dictionary.
For the sake of clarity, the letter was not referring to the �GCSE revamp� as claimed in the headline. This had not been unveiled when the letter was written. It was referring to the Government�s approach to the teaching of history, as outlined in statements made by the Education Secretary and the Prime Minister, and in the draft National Curriculum for History released last February.
Katherine Edwards
History teacher, Ashtead Surrey

Reasons to stay in the middle lane
I have no quarrel with the comments by Jackie Hawkins (letter, 15 June) regarding fast-lane hoggers, who like tailgaters are clearly a dangerous menace.
On the question of middle-lane hogging, surely the whole point of safe driving on any roads is the ability and willingness to adjust to the prevailing conditions and immediate situation. When on a motorway I frequently drive at around 70mph, leaving the outside lane free for the speed merchants.
Thus I may spend a considerable time in the middle lane, passing slower vehicles, and when a gap appears in the slow lane ahead I make a judgement based on the length of that gap and the likely speed of the more distant car (or lorry) in sight. In addition, if I am aware a junction is coming up I would tend to stay in the middle to allow new traffic on to the road.
Experienced drivers factor in all these variables and more when driving alertly and flexibly. However, from your correspondence pages it would seem that others prefer a more rigid, fundamentalist approach, with eyeballs bulging and steam hissing from their ears as they hop round one slow-lane vehicle at a time, driving on the moral highroad from illusion to pomposity.
Steve Edwards
Haywards Heath, West Sussex
My friend Bubs (beard, Harley-Davidson, etc) has an amusing way of dealing with middle-lane hoggers. He overtakes, moves across to the left-hand lane, slows, pulls into the outside lane and overtakes again. He reckons two circuits like this gets them to move into the correct lane.
Tony Wood
Farnborough, Hampshire

Things we are not allowed to know
Steve Richards argues (13 June) that government workings are transparent and that it is our fault if we don�t know what they are doing. I couldn�t disagree more.
Here are three major counterexamples. First, Blair deliberately hid from us the weakness of the case on which the Iraq war was fought. Second, tens of billions of pounds of our money have been spent on private finance initiatives the true costs of which are too �commercially sensitive� for us to be told anything about. Third, major companies have apparently not been obliged to pay huge tax bills but again we are not told how this could possibly have happened.
Bring on true transparency, but don�t hold your breath!
Michael W Eysenck
London SW20

Share out the royal riches
Ostensibly our culture prohibits personal gain in public office. As a local government employee, I had to �declare� small gifts of biscuits at Christmas destined for the communal tea room, and on the grander scale we are aware of the MPs� expenses issues.
I find it incongruous that royals seemingly take advantage of their positions to accrue wealth, whilst maintaining popularity through spin doctors and PR experts (�Revealed; Prince Charles�s secret life as a multimillion-pound property dealer�, 15 June).
Perhaps now is the time to thank them kindly, assign them pensions, redistribute their wealth, and consign them and all feudal anachronism to fairy tales and pantomimes - the right places for kings, queens and princes.
John McLorinan
Weston super Mare, North Somerset

Two families in unequal Britain
There was an exquisite depiction of the vile but accepted inequalities in our society in the juxtaposition of two stories on page 9 of your 13 June issue. The ex-wife of an oil tycoon is awarded �17.5m in a court settlement. An 11-year-old boy is refused a school dinner because his parents owe �1.75.
The ex-wife apparently claimed that �justice had prevailed�. The school governors evidently have the brass neck to hold that justice was also served in the case of the hungry young boy. Perhaps so - depending on one�s definition of justice - but where is the moral equivalence?
David Hodgen
Newbold Verdon, Leicestershire

Don�t try to save these coins
It looks to me as if at least two of the pound coins shown in the stack illustrating your article �Regular saver accounts ideal for those trying to get started� (15 June) are counterfeit. The lettering on the edge is too crude to be genuine.
I believe that about 3 per cent of the coins in circulation are counterfeit, so you seem to have been unlucky if you photographed a random selection. If you wish to save you would be well advised to ensure that you avoid presenting false coinage to your bank.
Antony Barber
Truro

�Culture� doesn�t excuse mutilation
The authorities are failing to prosecute those guilty of carrying out female genital mutilation in the UK. If this is because of �multiculturalism�, it�s a misunderstanding: all cultures change all the time.
Those, like me, supporting the right of peoples to choose their own ways of life should not excuse extreme violence, irrespective of whether it�s perpetrated in the name of �culture�. There are individuals and organisations within the cultures in question opposing FGM. They should be supported and those who practise FGM should be prosecuted.
Stephen Corry
Director, Survival International
London EC1

Warm work
Your leader (15 June) concludes that the outcome of a conference of meteorologists assembling on Tuesday to discuss recent cold summers will be more hot air. I hope so; summer starts on Wednesday.
David Weston
Oxford

Should you have almost any inquiries with regards to in which as well as tips on how to use Haywards Heath Tax Accountants, it is possible to call us with our web site.

Personal tools